| 1 |
On Sat, 16 Jun 2012 16:29:09 +0200 |
| 2 |
Pacho Ramos <pacho@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
> I thought last Zac suggestion of ABI_SLOT modified to use |
| 4 |
> "SLOT=ble/bla" was clear enough and we reached a consensus. |
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
Possibly. I'm waiting to see an implementation, a bunch of examples and |
| 7 |
a comparison with just using SLOT and := or :*. |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
> About what I am trying to solve, I have explained it multiple times in |
| 10 |
> involved thread and won't repeat them once again. |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
Describing the problem clearly and correctly, and in the appropriate |
| 13 |
amount of generality, is the hardest and most important part of the |
| 14 |
process. Figuring out what we're trying to solve is far harder than |
| 15 |
writing a bit of code. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
-- |
| 18 |
Ciaran McCreesh |
Archives