| 1 |
I agree with your limits and your reasoning. |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
Don. |
| 4 |
|
| 5 |
On Wed, Jul 23, 2003 at 08:56:12AM -0400, Kurt Lieber wrote: |
| 6 |
> Per-file size limit: |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> commercial products > 100MB |
| 9 |
> non-commercial products > 500MB |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> The reasoning behind this is that commercial products typically have |
| 12 |
> resources and funding behind them to offer a fairly robust downloading |
| 13 |
> experience to their users meaning we can avoid mirroring them ourselves |
| 14 |
> without impacting our user base to a significant degree. non-commercial |
| 15 |
> products often don't have the same resources available to them, so we would |
| 16 |
> continue to mirror all but the largest files in that case. (currently, |
| 17 |
> there are no non-commercial products in our tree that would be affected by |
| 18 |
> this cap limit) |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
-- |
| 21 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives