Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Mike Frysinger <vapier@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: [gentoo-dev] proxy maintainership and gentoo-x86 scm
Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2010 15:53:58
Message-Id: 201001131054.03953.vapier@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Last rites: net-nntp/inn by Ben de Groot
1 On Tuesday 12 January 2010 15:35:45 Ben de Groot wrote:
2 > 2010/1/12 Markos Chandras <hwoarang@g.o>:
3 > > If you feel like it, become a proxy-maintainer and poke a developer to
4 > > put your ebuilds on tree. Have you ever heard of that ? :)
5 >
6 > Proxy-maintainership should be given a MUCH higher profile in Gentoo,
7 > in my opinion. It is a virtually unknown option.
8
9 i think our current work flows also significantly impede the smooth running of
10 this. if we had were using a dscm (git) on gentoo-x86, i feel like it'd be a
11 much smoother ride for Gentoo devs to pull from a proxy maintainer and push on
12 their behalf.
13 -mike

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] proxy maintainership and gentoo-x86 scm Ben de Groot <yngwin@g.o>
Re: [gentoo-dev] proxy maintainership and gentoo-x86 scm Nirbheek Chauhan <nirbheek@g.o>