| 1 |
On Thu, 2007-19-07 at 15:22 -0700, Chris Gianelloni wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Thu, 2007-07-19 at 16:02 -0600, Jim Ramsay wrote: |
| 3 |
> > I'm all for doing it now in the profile, but it's not my package. |
| 4 |
> > Perhaps someone from the net-im herd can make this decision? |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> Well, as someone who spends a lot of time working on/with profiles, I |
| 7 |
> say go for it. Since these changes would only affect the one package |
| 8 |
> and wouldn't pull in any "strange" dependencies on people, we should |
| 9 |
> probably do it as high in the profile structure as possible (base? |
| 10 |
> default-linux?) so it hits the most users. |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> I'd like to hear from net-im, as they're ultimately responsible, but I |
| 13 |
> don't really see the harm in doing it, so we probably should as it will |
| 14 |
> reduce headaches for our users. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
Talking with my net-im hat, I'd say go for it.. Except for silc and |
| 17 |
zephyr (which may or may not work very well) and should probably stay |
| 18 |
off. |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
-- |
| 21 |
Olivier Crête |
| 22 |
tester@g.o |
| 23 |
Gentoo Developer |
Archives