| 1 |
On Thu, Nov 27, 2003 at 04:19:04PM +0000, Luke-Jr wrote: |
| 2 |
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
| 3 |
> Hash: SHA1 |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
> On Thursday 27 November 2003 04:12 pm, Jason Wever wrote: |
| 6 |
> > My $0.02 is that if this gets implemented, it should be put in so that the |
| 7 |
> > default behavior is like portage is now, |
| 8 |
> Since Portage as it is right now doesn't pay any attention to licenses, its |
| 9 |
> legality could be questioned (as with the games issue before?) |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
I explained this to you the other day. |
| 12 |
In addition to what I said at the time: installing software, using |
| 13 |
software, and redistributing software are all very different animals. |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
[snip] |
| 16 |
> >From a support perspective, if this gets implemented, I'm forwarding all |
| 17 |
> > of these questions, bugs, etc to the "free and only free" software folks. |
| 18 |
> > Please dont' take away one "freedom" for another. |
| 19 |
> As long as there is an option (editing the ACCEPT_LICENSES), there is no |
| 20 |
> freedom being removed. |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
Indeed. Now we're discussing convienence. |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
-- |
| 25 |
Jon Portnoy |
| 26 |
avenj/irc.freenode.net |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
-- |
| 29 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives