Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: William Hubbs <williamh@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: newsitem: unmasking udev-181
Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2012 23:16:12
Message-Id: 20120311231517.GA7994@linux1
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: newsitem: unmasking udev-181 by "Petteri Räty"
On Sun, Mar 11, 2012 at 11:48:19PM +0200, Petteri Räty wrote:
> On 11.3.2012 23.43, William Hubbs wrote: > > On Sun, Mar 11, 2012 at 11:28:19PM +0200, Petteri Räty wrote: > >> On 11.3.2012 17.33, Zac Medico wrote: > >>> On 03/11/2012 04:03 AM, Petteri Räty wrote: > >>>> The Display-If-Installed atom shows the news item to stable users once > >>>> it's committed. I am not sure at what point does Portage show it when > >>>> the atom is >= so we might want to evaluate the options. > >>> > >>> It's displayed after the package is installed, before emerge exits, just > >>> after the message about config file updates. > >> > >> Based on this I think >= is better than < so people will get when they > >> actually update. > > > > That means that people won't be notified that they have the news item to > > read until after they install >= sys-fs/udev-181. > > > > Is that how we would want this to work? > > > > William > > How do you plan to handle notifying stable users if you go with <?
I was thinking of another news item once we are ready to go stable. What do you think? William

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: newsitem: unmasking udev-181 Rich Freeman <rich0@g.o>
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: newsitem: unmasking udev-181 "Petteri Räty" <betelgeuse@g.o>