| 1 |
On Sun, Mar 11, 2012 at 11:48:19PM +0200, Petteri Räty wrote: |
| 2 |
> On 11.3.2012 23.43, William Hubbs wrote: |
| 3 |
> > On Sun, Mar 11, 2012 at 11:28:19PM +0200, Petteri Räty wrote: |
| 4 |
> >> On 11.3.2012 17.33, Zac Medico wrote: |
| 5 |
> >>> On 03/11/2012 04:03 AM, Petteri Räty wrote: |
| 6 |
> >>>> The Display-If-Installed atom shows the news item to stable users once |
| 7 |
> >>>> it's committed. I am not sure at what point does Portage show it when |
| 8 |
> >>>> the atom is >= so we might want to evaluate the options. |
| 9 |
> >>> |
| 10 |
> >>> It's displayed after the package is installed, before emerge exits, just |
| 11 |
> >>> after the message about config file updates. |
| 12 |
> >> |
| 13 |
> >> Based on this I think >= is better than < so people will get when they |
| 14 |
> >> actually update. |
| 15 |
> > |
| 16 |
> > That means that people won't be notified that they have the news item to |
| 17 |
> > read until after they install >= sys-fs/udev-181. |
| 18 |
> > |
| 19 |
> > Is that how we would want this to work? |
| 20 |
> > |
| 21 |
> > William |
| 22 |
> |
| 23 |
> How do you plan to handle notifying stable users if you go with <? |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
I was thinking of another news item once we are ready to go stable. |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
What do you think? |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
William |
Archives