| 1 |
On Wed, Jun 06, 2012 at 09:50:01PM +0300, Samuli Suominen wrote: |
| 2 |
> then when they do upgrade to new xulrunner, it's possible to package it |
| 3 |
> from firefox tarball |
| 4 |
> mozilla upstream doesn't support this, but some other distribs are |
| 5 |
> packaging it[1] |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> [1] http://www.archlinux.org/packages/extra/x86_64/xulrunner/ |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> but nothing in portage is requiring this, so -1 for packaging it from |
| 10 |
> me, as they should really upgrade to something else, like webkit-gtk... |
| 11 |
Can you run an app that relies on remotely served XUL under WebKit, on |
| 12 |
Windows, OSX, Linux with that? |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
If so, I'll suggest it to upstream. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
-- |
| 17 |
Robin Hugh Johnson |
| 18 |
Gentoo Linux: Developer, Trustee & Infrastructure Lead |
| 19 |
E-Mail : robbat2@g.o |
| 20 |
GnuPG FP : 11ACBA4F 4778E3F6 E4EDF38E B27B944E 34884E85 |
Archives