Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: "Spider (D.m.D. Lj.)" <spider@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: [gentoo-dev] glibc & binutils -aware hackers wanted for questions ;)
Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2005 01:32:33
Message-Id: 1133227796.4229.2.camel@Darkmere.darkmere
1 Hello,
2 I've been looking some at Michael Meeks -Bdirect patches, and the
3 possible performance boost they could give.
4
5 The good parts here is that it seems to be far less intrusive for the
6 running system than prelink is, on the other hand, it does require a
7 more intrusive surgery into the core systems.
8
9 So, now I'm just asking for comments and/or discussion here.. would it
10 be worth the time spent on this?
11 http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2005-10/msg00436.html
12
13
14
15 //Spider
16
17 --
18 begin .signature
19 Tortured users / Laughing in pain
20 See Microsoft KB Article Q265230 for more information.
21 end

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies