1 |
On Mon, Jul 11, 2022 at 1:57 PM Ulrich Mueller <ulm@g.o> wrote: |
2 |
> |
3 |
> >>>>> On Mon, 11 Jul 2022, Mike Gilbert wrote: |
4 |
> |
5 |
> >> Maybe leave ebegin/eend in place then, which was invented precisely for |
6 |
> >> this use case? What's so bad about nesting it? |
7 |
> |
8 |
> > It leads to odd looking output. |
9 |
> |
10 |
> > https://gitweb.gentoo.org/proj/portage.git/commit/?id=eba088af8f335c0adb386461e6df1267e24800e7 |
11 |
> |
12 |
> IIUC it would look like this, with the patch applied: |
13 |
> |
14 |
> * task 1 |
15 |
> * Doing task 2 ... [ ok ] |
16 |
> * task 1 succeeded |
17 |
> |
18 |
> That's not the most beautiful of outputs either. |
19 |
|
20 |
Right. I would prefer to apply the first patch I submitted instead. |