Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: waltdnes@××××××××.org
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Signed push & clock drift rejection
Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2016 11:30:00
Message-Id: 20160719112949.GA27377@waltdnes.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Signed push & clock drift rejection by "Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn"
1 On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 10:07:12AM +0200, Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguy???n wrote
2 > Kent Fredric schrieb:
3 > > On Mon, 18 Jul 2016 22:21:22 -0400
4 > > waltdnes@××××××××.org wrote:
5 > >
6 > >> I'm amazed that "robust linux servers" are deathly afraid of simply
7 > >> setting the time, and being done with it.
8 > >
9 > > There's problems at the software level everywhere that are not so
10 > > simply solved.
11 > >
12 > > A more obvious example is in the event your system time gets *ahead* of
13 > > real-time.
14 >
15 > And even if the system is behind time, it can cause problems. cronjobs
16 > running unexpectedly close to each other (or missed cronjobs in extreme
17 > cases). User sessions expiring early, etc.
18 >
19 > And even if there is only one second, and that is known well ahead
20 > (e.g. leap seconds): Unless you know that there isn't going to be
21 > a problem, a great deal of care needs to go into handling that.
22
23 In that case, the dev machine should be a separate machine from the
24 server. They don't even have to be separate physical machines. Do the
25 dev work in a VM, and set the time in the VM just before doing the push.
26
27 --
28 Walter Dnes <waltdnes@××××××××.org>
29 I don't run "desktop environments"; I run useful applications

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] Signed push & clock drift rejection "Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn" <chithanh@g.o>