1 |
On 23 June 2010 01:47, Mike Auty <ikelos@g.o> wrote: |
2 |
[...] |
3 |
>> Which should not be an issue since any library that has some sort of |
4 |
>> introspection can use this flag (and the use.desc can be changed |
5 |
>> appropriately at that time if it does not use gobject-introspection). |
6 |
> |
7 |
> Why have to change it in the future (and probably split it into two |
8 |
> flags then), when the choice hasn't been made yet? Or, to put your own |
9 |
> question to you, why are you vehemently for "introspection" when others |
10 |
> have shown concern with the choice? As far as I can see, the only |
11 |
> difference is requiring a slightly longer use_enable line. |
12 |
|
13 |
Mostly because I don't want to coin a new term if it's not absolutely necessary. |
14 |
|
15 |
That said, you're right - more people seem to be comfortable with |
16 |
"gintrospection" than plain "introspection". If no further objections |
17 |
arise, we'll go with "gintrospection". |
18 |
|
19 |
Thanks, |
20 |
-- |
21 |
Arun Raghavan |
22 |
http://arunraghavan.net/ |
23 |
(Ford_Prefect | Gentoo) & (arunsr | GNOME) |