| 1 |
Hi -- |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
On 18:52 Thu 27 Nov , Philippe Lafoucri?re wrote: |
| 4 |
> > |
| 5 |
> > It's hard to build an alternative UI if design is like this - the result |
| 6 |
> > is always that developers of alternative frontends simply reinvent the |
| 7 |
> > wheel for their frontend: Instead of using predefined routines for basic |
| 8 |
> > tasks they have to completely reimplement emerge for the application |
| 9 |
> > they are building. This is a problem. |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> I totally agree with you. Developing an UI for portage is really painfull :( |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
Yes, "portage-ng" will fix these problems, not to say portage-ng is going to be |
| 16 |
a panacea but Daniel Robbins has many ideas to increase the modularity and |
| 17 |
extensibility of portage. I also have many ideas regarding this, and hopefully |
| 18 |
they will be considered in future version of portage. :) |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
-- Jason |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
-- |
| 24 |
-------------------------~ |
| 25 |
----------Jason-A-Mobarak-~ |
| 26 |
-aether-at-gentoo-dot-org-~ |
| 27 |
-------------------------~ |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
-- |
| 31 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives