Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Rich Freeman <rich0@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev <gentoo-dev@l.g.o>
Cc: Peter Stuge <peter@×××××.se>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Review: USE=libav news item
Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2015 15:51:34
Message-Id: CAGfcS_k1=0wtNN5eCQHVmcH5Ws9mBWrKiVSVi4XHO4-RkH_WDw@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Review: USE=libav news item by "Michał Górny"
1 On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 10:30 AM, Michał Górny <mgorny@g.o> wrote:
2 > Dnia 2015-01-26, o godz. 12:15:49
3 > Peter Stuge <peter@×××××.se> napisał(a):
4 >
5 >> "the ffmpeg fork" above is very confusing because libav is the ffmpeg
6 >> fork, and I think what you mean here is simply "ffmpeg". I suggest:
7 >
8 > Well, you aren't correct which of the two is actually the fork but I
9 > can see the confusion.
10
11 Well, we can avoid all the politics entirely if we just drop the word
12 fork. The goal here is to avoid driving our users off of cliffs with
13 non-intuitive behavior, not to settle who is right and wrong.
14
15 --
16 Rich