Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Mikael Hallendal <micke@×××××××××××.se>
To: gentoo-dev@××××××××××.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] BitchX and esound
Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2001 10:08:25
Message-Id: 1001258058.28662.339.camel@zoidberg
In Reply to: [gentoo-dev] BitchX and esound by "Bruce A. Locke"
1 s_ 2001-09-23 klockan 05.22 skrev Bruce A. Locke:
2 >
3 > Hello... Enabling sound support in BitchX requires esound 0.2.5 or better.
4 > The only version of esound we have in portage is 0.2.22. The problem
5 > with this is that 0.2.22 is _not_ newer then 0.2.5. And with sound
6 > support enabled BitchX's configure script bombs horribly so for now I've
7 > commented out such support from BitchX's ebuild.
8
9 Hmm .. I built it with esound-support yesterday (esound 0.2.22-r2).
10
11 No problems at all.
12
13 Btw, what idiot would name the package so that 0.2.22 is not newer than
14 0.2.5?
15
16 Regards,
17 Mikael Hallendal
18
19 --
20 Mikael Hallendal micke@×××××××××××.se
21 CodeFactory AB http://www.codefactory.se/
22 Office: +46 (0)8 587 583 05 Cell: +46 (0)709 718 918

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] BitchX and esound Martin Schlemmer <azarah@×××××××××.net>
Re: [gentoo-dev] BitchX and esound "Bruce A. Locke" <blocke@××××××.org>