Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Mikael Hallendal <micke@×××××××××××.se>
To: gentoo-dev@××××××××××.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] BitchX and esound
Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2001 10:08:25
Message-Id: 1001258058.28662.339.camel@zoidberg
In Reply to: [gentoo-dev] BitchX and esound by "Bruce A. Locke"
s_ 2001-09-23 klockan 05.22 skrev Bruce A. Locke:
> > Hello... Enabling sound support in BitchX requires esound 0.2.5 or better. > The only version of esound we have in portage is 0.2.22. The problem > with this is that 0.2.22 is _not_ newer then 0.2.5. And with sound > support enabled BitchX's configure script bombs horribly so for now I've > commented out such support from BitchX's ebuild.
Hmm .. I built it with esound-support yesterday (esound 0.2.22-r2). No problems at all. Btw, what idiot would name the package so that 0.2.22 is not newer than 0.2.5? Regards, Mikael Hallendal -- Mikael Hallendal micke@×××××××××××.se CodeFactory AB http://www.codefactory.se/ Office: +46 (0)8 587 583 05 Cell: +46 (0)709 718 918

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] BitchX and esound "Bruce A. Locke" <blocke@××××××.org>
Re: [gentoo-dev] BitchX and esound Martin Schlemmer <azarah@×××××××××.net>