Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: hasufell <hasufell@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: review required by herd? (new ebuild)
Date: Sat, 26 May 2012 12:25:18
Message-Id: 4FC0CA99.6000308@gentoo.org
In Reply to: [gentoo-dev] Re: review required by herd? (new ebuild) by Ryan Hill
1 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
2 Hash: SHA1
3
4 On 05/26/2012 05:23 AM, Ryan Hill wrote:
5 > On Sat, 26 May 2012 02:33:06 +0200 hasufell <hasufell@g.o>
6 > wrote:
7 >
8 >> What's the official policy, so everyone can be clear about this?
9 >
10 > It's not a requirement, except when it is. :)
11 >
12 > Some projects are territorial. Games is one. I imagine adding
13 > something to kde, gnome, or xfce categories without contacting
14 > those guys would get you an email. If in doubt I usually file a
15 > bug when I'm adding a package and CC them. If they don't respond,
16 > I add it.
17 >
18 > So there is no general requirement to get a review unless the
19 > project in question has said otherwise. When in doubt, ask.
20 >
21 >
22 > PS. herds are groups of packages. think sheep. teams/projects
23 > manage the herds.
24 >
25 >
26
27 Ok.
28
29 Does this maybe lack documentation? (i.e. under Developer hierarchy)
30
31 http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/devrel/handbook/handbook.xml
32 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
33 Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux)
34 Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
35
36 iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJPwMqZAAoJEFpvPKfnPDWzzmUIALFXKGPzKzPkhP+OXc4hSTO2
37 RMGEaZndpvw2I/WKwsbKc4T0Ge0YhsQR+coEkf6CMRBu078zq/In3WeJY2mQmvge
38 /dsWWpoVFzudPRCbe10tZJRr9zfQGzrwHRteSmAR+1IqNFXZN5xiz+lUNGotXx2k
39 Rwybg7CuxKQcWN4YlNBGFu2xbTfADHQjSrUE7kxRAoaxxW8n5WlvnWVLNsN7Iej7
40 uV4/nvFD8qO3J+y+17gybpkTMTOK57bDpXXHFm9S5CRX7aXuOQhJcezrks9wQ0lJ
41 iXPP+U9/D5QLlk6WVjnzznKOvsSj93/CgBwEJFwCxmMIldG+U45EpTEGjkJ216k=
42 =78a1
43 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----