| 1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
| 2 |
Hash: SHA1 |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
| 5 |
> a) PROPERTIES can't be used to implement any mandatory feature |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
This is true in the absence of an EAPI bump. However, for |
| 8 |
completeness, I'd like to mention that it is possible to specify |
| 9 |
that a given PROPERTIES value have mandatory support in a new EAPI. |
| 10 |
- -- |
| 11 |
Thanks, |
| 12 |
Zac |
| 13 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 14 |
Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux) |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
iEYEARECAAYFAkjFUMoACgkQ/ejvha5XGaOe3QCeMpfjBytS4QRGLVxb/DDQ2B6O |
| 17 |
ynkAnAjNiIQmK6I3LPQUQ4HwMGR4HRMy |
| 18 |
=+P7L |
| 19 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
Archives