1 |
El dom, 27-05-2012 a las 17:16 -0700, Zac Medico escribió: |
2 |
> On 05/27/2012 11:12 AM, Samuli Suominen wrote: |
3 |
> > Fedora rawhide and ArchLinux switched to libusbx and followed suit in |
4 |
> > our virtual/libusb:1. |
5 |
> > Debian is considering the switch also. We'll see... |
6 |
> > |
7 |
> > I've been in contact with the new maintainer, and he assured me the |
8 |
> > compability will be kept for libusb-compat. |
9 |
> > |
10 |
> > Happy testing, |
11 |
> > |
12 |
> > # emerge -C dev-libs/libusb:1 |
13 |
> > # emerge -1 dev-libs/libusbx:1 |
14 |
> |
15 |
> I've tried this on my laptop, and afterwards it wouldn't suspend to ram |
16 |
> when it was supposed to. I didn't do any real troubleshooting, so I'm |
17 |
> just mentioning it here in case it helps someone else recognize the |
18 |
> source of the problem. This was with sys-power/upower-0.9.16 and |
19 |
> dev-libs/libusbx-1.0.11 (I didn't try to rebuild upower after switching |
20 |
> from dev-libs/libusb-1.0.9 to dev-libs/libusbx-1.0.11). |
21 |
|
22 |
Maybe you should open a bug report for it to not forget that problem |
23 |
(now that finally my laptop suspends even with upstream kernel and |
24 |
without TOI wouldn't like to see it magically failing again without |
25 |
remember the real culprit ;)) |