From: | Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccreesh@××××××××××.com> | ||
---|---|---|---|
To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] FYI: Rules for distro-friendly packages | ||
Date: | Sat, 26 Jun 2010 20:13:06 | ||
Message-Id: | 20100626211254.002784d4@snowcone | ||
In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] FYI: Rules for distro-friendly packages by Enrico Weigelt |
1 | On Sat, 26 Jun 2010 21:57:33 +0200 |
2 | Enrico Weigelt <weigelt@×××××.de> wrote: |
3 | > > Uhm. No. Certain compilers will give you warnings for f(g(a), g(b)) |
4 | > > if you -Wall. |
5 | > |
6 | > Warn on what exactly ? |
7 | |
8 | That f's arguments are evaluated in an unspecified order. |
9 | |
10 | > Which compilers do that ? |
11 | |
12 | For all you know, gcc 4.7. |
13 | |
14 | New gcc releases regularly issue lots of new warnings for correct code, |
15 | particularly with -Wall. Other compilers are even worse. |
16 | |
17 | -- |
18 | Ciaran McCreesh |
File name | MIME type |
---|---|
signature.asc | application/pgp-signature |
Subject | Author |
---|---|
[gentoo-dev] Re: FYI: Rules for distro-friendly packages | Nikos Chantziaras <realnc@×××××.de> |