| 1 |
Fabian Groffen posted on Thu, 28 Oct 2010 11:30:55 +0200 as excerpted: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> On 28-10-2010 09:25:23 +0000, Samuli Suominen wrote: |
| 4 |
>> ssuominen 10/10/28 09:25:23 |
| 5 |
>> |
| 6 |
>> Modified: aggregate-1.6.ebuild Log: |
| 7 |
>> qa |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> I think it would be good practice if you would give a summary of what |
| 10 |
> type of QA you applied, even though for you it may be obvious. |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
++ |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
I noticed an equally impenetrable two-letter "qa" changelog entry on |
| 15 |
another package recently. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
Please at /least/ list a bug number, or what sort of changes were made (in |
| 18 |
general). Some of us Gentoo users take the admin part of the job |
| 19 |
seriously, you know, and get frustrated when the log is as opaque as that |
| 20 |
one was. |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
Here, a simple: |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
"QA: cleanup, EAPI change" |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
... would have been reasonable enough detail, from /my/ admin perspective, |
| 27 |
at least. |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
Thanks. =:^) |
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
-- |
| 32 |
Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs. |
| 33 |
"Every nonfree program has a lord, a master -- |
| 34 |
and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman |
Archives