| 1 |
Le samedi 22 avril 2017 à 23:03 +0200, Michał Górny a écrit : |
| 2 |
> On sob, 2017-04-22 at 13:43 -0400, Mike Gilbert wrote: |
| 3 |
> > |
| 4 |
> > On Sat, Apr 22, 2017 at 4:20 AM, Michał Górny <mgorny@g.o> |
| 5 |
> > wrote: |
| 6 |
> > > |
| 7 |
> > > Respect EROOT when running gtk-query-immodules-* tools, alike |
| 8 |
> > > other |
| 9 |
> > > updaters in the eclass. This ensures that x11-libs/gtk+ installs |
| 10 |
> > > correctly when installing to a ROOT. |
| 11 |
> > |
| 12 |
> > I'm not an expert on this eclass, but it seems like this may be |
| 13 |
> > intentional; calling compiled binaries from $ROOT will break for |
| 14 |
> > cross-compiles. |
| 15 |
> > |
| 16 |
> > Is there some package that installs ${CHOST}-gtk-query-immodules- |
| 17 |
> > X.0 |
| 18 |
> > for ROOT == /? I don't have any such binary on my system. |
| 19 |
> > |
| 20 |
> |
| 21 |
> I was thinking about this possibility too but it doesn't look like |
| 22 |
> any |
| 23 |
> of the remaining code was done like this, nor the GTK+ ebuild which |
| 24 |
> calls this function. But I'll wait for the GNOME team to confirm what |
| 25 |
> they want. |
| 26 |
> |
| 27 |
Looking at the ebuilds, it looks like your patch is correct. I honestly |
| 28 |
cannot remember why we used EPREFIX and not EROOT. |
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
-- |
| 31 |
Gilles Dartiguelongue <eva@g.o> |
Archives