Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Georgi Georgiev <chutz@×××.net>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] xchat's use of local USE flag xchatnogtk
Date: Sat, 03 Apr 2004 01:04:55
Message-Id: 20040403010449.GA4243@lion.gg3.net
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] xchat's use of local USE flag xchatnogtk by Chris Gianelloni
maillog: 02/04/2004-13:49:49(-0500): Chris Gianelloni types
> On Fri, 2004-04-02 at 05:09, Andrew Ross wrote: > > In future, should queries like this be sent: > > > > 1. directly to the maintainer of the package (using the herd email alias > > when no specific maintainer is listed in metadata.xml)? > > > > 2. to gentoo-dev (since it's ebuild-related)? > > > > 3. to gentoo-user (so the devs can continue important discussions on > > gentoo-dev)? > > > > 4. bugzilla (although who am I to second-guess devs, esp if there turns > > out to be a perfectly good reason for it)? > > They should be sent to bugzilla, I would think. Gentoo-dev is for > discussion about Gentoo development, so I would see it fitting there, > also.
I for example don't like posting to bugzilla, if I am not sure that what I am posting is a bug. -- / Georgi Georgiev / Nostalgia isn't what it used to be. / \ chutz@×××.net \ \ / +81(90)6266-1163 / /

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] xchat's use of local USE flag xchatnogtk John Nilsson <john@×××××××.nu>