1 |
On Sun, 18 Dec 2011 21:26:08 -0500 |
2 |
Alexandre Rostovtsev <tetromino@g.o> wrote: |
3 |
|
4 |
> On Sun, 2011-12-18 at 23:02 +0100, Michał Górny wrote: |
5 |
> > What if 'foo' has slot named 'bar', and there is unslotted 'foo-bar' |
6 |
> > package? :P |
7 |
> |
8 |
> There are no such examples in the tree. The only ebuilds I could find |
9 |
> with non-numeric slots are various kernel sources, chromium, |
10 |
> google-chrome, beautifulsoup, python-dateutil, b43-firmware, |
11 |
> binutils-apple, gcc-apple, and rep-gtk. If cross-compiling there is |
12 |
> also insight, gdb, newlib, and uclibc, maybe a few more packages from |
13 |
> sys-devel/. |
14 |
> |
15 |
> For completeness, I suppose that it wouldn't hurt to add a provision |
16 |
> to allow package maintainers to choose a different documentation |
17 |
> directory if that's required to prevent a file collision. |
18 |
|
19 |
For completeness, could you post a list of packages that would benefit |
20 |
from your proposed changes? It's a little thing called scope. :) |
21 |
|
22 |
|
23 |
jer |