| 1 |
On 8 September 2013 14:00, Mikle Kolyada <zlogene@g.o> wrote: |
| 2 |
> |
| 3 |
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
| 4 |
> Hash: SHA1 |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> Hi guys! |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> Few days ago i was surprised, when i saw perl-5.18 unhardmasked. |
| 9 |
> So, i want ask here. |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> @Patrick, why you unmask it? You even not ack perl herd about it. It was |
| 13 |
> in the tree about two weeks, too early for unmasking, furthermore, you |
| 14 |
> added not all modules need for perl-5.18 in the tree. Now many users ask |
| 15 |
> us "why perl 5.18 broke our modules?" Its not good. Testing on three |
| 16 |
> boxes w/o problems, no major reason for unmasking. And also, many CPAN |
| 17 |
> guys still no fix own modules for compile with-5.18 |
| 18 |
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 19 |
> Version: GnuPG v2.0.20 (GNU/Linux) |
| 20 |
> |
| 21 |
> iJwEAQECAAYFAlIsdO0ACgkQG9wOWsQutdat/QQAsLcbqEn6NZGFAoipWZuBCxMM |
| 22 |
> Q5BPj7a43vLEuI08aCbOeiihVWqEEVqPOWJyXAoSohkOL5DhmRfv1e6z4JPX2BGv |
| 23 |
> dH/HFBkFtWH3gVOg7BV+rvecSb/ds6M2zufjnSHfBxomAuSKiFru1lQGYoVbPOrZ |
| 24 |
> Gwpy66uY2LZ9kBNkM/Q= |
| 25 |
> =USUZ |
| 26 |
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 27 |
> |
| 28 |
> |
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
Hi, |
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
If you feel it should not be unmask then please mask it again. |
| 33 |
Although it might be too late for that. |
| 34 |
Moreover, I don't think raising this issue to the mailing list |
| 35 |
is appropriate as a first step. Did you try to talk to him? If you |
| 36 |
feel he violated the perl@ team policies please consider |
| 37 |
following the QA policy for such violations |
| 38 |
|
| 39 |
https://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/glep/glep-0048.html |
| 40 |
|
| 41 |
-- |
| 42 |
Regards, |
| 43 |
Markos Chandras - Gentoo Linux Developer |
| 44 |
http://dev.gentoo.org/~hwoarang |
Archives