1 |
On Sun, 2003-06-29 at 19:41, Grant Goodyear wrote: |
2 |
> Fair enough. Also, I think we should do away w/ the unnecessary |
3 |
> distinction between Informational and Standards-Track GLEPS. |
4 |
|
5 |
I think it would be more appropriate to rename Standards-Track to |
6 |
something more descriptive rather than doing away with it (you suggested |
7 |
that in GLEP1). Maybe "Action" or "Enhancement"? |
8 |
|
9 |
> > Of course, then comes the point, how and who gets to say whether a |
10 |
> > particular proposal as minor/major? :) |
11 |
> |
12 |
> Well, surely that's something to be debated as part of the GLEP. |
13 |
> Presumably the GLEP author assigns an expected impact, the editors can |
14 |
> change that impact (with the author's approval?), and the final impact |
15 |
> rating can be altered during the GLEPs discussion. |
16 |
|
17 |
Sounds good to me. |
18 |
|
19 |
> We really need to have at least two editors. Care to formally |
20 |
> volunteer for the job? If so, please ask klieber to give you cvs |
21 |
> permissions for the GLEP site. |
22 |
|
23 |
No problems. I'd like to volunteer myself to get this off the ground |
24 |
(<-- formal) :) |
25 |
|
26 |
> comments? |
27 |
|
28 |
Just in case people have forgotten, the URL is: |
29 |
http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/glep/ |
30 |
|
31 |
Cheers, |
32 |
-- |
33 |
Alastair 'liquidx' Tse |
34 |
>> Gentoo Developer |
35 |
>> http://www.liquidx.net/ | http://cvs.gentoo.org/~liquidx/ |
36 |
>> GPG Key : http://cvs.gentoo.org/~liquidx/liquidx_gentoo_org.asc |
37 |
>> FingerPrint : 579A 9B0E 43E8 0E40 EE93 BB1C 38CE 1C7B 3907 14F6 |