1 |
On 06/24/2012 10:07 AM, Ben de Groot wrote: |
2 |
> I don't see what the problem is now. We have slots, usedeps and |
3 |
> required_use. Why would we need to avoid using gtk2/gtk3 useflags? |
4 |
> |
5 |
> We of the Qt team are expecting Qt5 to enter the tree within the |
6 |
> next few months, and I'm not expecting any trouble with using |
7 |
> qt4 and qt5 useflags. |
8 |
|
9 |
Afais qt team has done this from the start? If there was no "gtk" |
10 |
useflag, but only "gtk2" the situation would maybe be different. |
11 |
Now we have gtk, gtk2 and gtk3 and the user has to figure out what they |
12 |
mean for each package, cause they are not used consistently. |
13 |
|
14 |
This is a problem. |
15 |
|
16 |
Either cleanly avoid slot reference in useflag name or go it all the |
17 |
way, but afaik the gnome herd is not interested much in supporting older |
18 |
versions of gtk+, so the first way seems the best. |