| 1 |
On 06/25/2012 12:15 AM, Mike Gilbert wrote: |
| 2 |
> An official release of grub-2.00 should be coming pretty soon. I would |
| 3 |
> like to keyword this for ~amd64 and ~x86 shortly after it hits the tree. |
| 4 |
> I don't do much work on base system packages, so I would like some |
| 5 |
> advice on how to make this as smooth as possible. |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> My main concern is that many people probably have sys-boot/grub in |
| 8 |
> @world. If grub:2 is made visible, portage will install it, and will |
| 9 |
> remove grub-0.97 on the next depclean. This could be a little confusing, |
| 10 |
> but should not cause any immediate damage since the copy of grub-0.97 |
| 11 |
> installed in the MBR and /boot would remain intact. |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
> Is this worthy of a news item? Or I just blog about it? |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
> Anything else I need to think about here? |
| 16 |
> |
| 17 |
> Note: The Gentoo Documentation Project has indicated that they do not |
| 18 |
> want to add anything to the handbook until we are somewhat close to |
| 19 |
> stabilizing grub:2. That's at least a couple months away. |
| 20 |
> |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
I think it would be best to move sys-boot/grub:2 to sys-boot/grub2. That |
| 23 |
should avoid confusion. |
Archives