| 1 |
Doug Goldstein wrote: |
| 2 |
> Currently in the tree we have sys-fs/ntfs3g. However the proper upstream |
| 3 |
> name and name referenced in every single doc in the world is "ntfs-3g". |
| 4 |
> I tried to rename the package however, Portage does not let me since it |
| 5 |
> is invalid naming. marienz and genone informed me it's invalid with PMS |
| 6 |
> as well. |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> The version I was trying to add is ntfs-3g-1.516. Logically Portage and |
| 9 |
> PMS should only consider any data after the LAST - as the version |
| 10 |
> information. |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
Would this cause problems anywhere if we had the following? |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
sys-fs/ntfs/ntfs-3g.ebuild |
| 15 |
and |
| 16 |
sys-fs/ntfs-3g/ntfs-3g-1.516.ebuild |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
Daniel |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
-- |
| 21 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives