| 1 |
Hi, |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
On 6/03/2013 18:07, Maxim Koltsov wrote: |
| 4 |
> Hi, |
| 5 |
> Currently there are 61 leechcraft packages in tree scattered across |
| 6 |
> several categories. We propose to move them to one new category to make |
| 7 |
> maintaining easy as well as rsync --exclude'ing. |
| 8 |
> So, two questions: |
| 9 |
> 1) Do you agree with adding new category? |
| 10 |
+1 |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
> 2) How should we call it: app-leechcraft, leechcraft-base or anything else? |
| 13 |
app-leechcraft sounds fine. I agree with what was mentioned in another |
| 14 |
post that leechcraft-base implies some other leechcraft category with extras |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
> |
| 17 |
> Thanks, |
| 18 |
> Maxim. |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
Best regards, |
| 21 |
Michael |
Archives