Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Mike Frysinger <vapier@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: udev and /usr
Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2011 02:28:02
Message-Id: 201109252227.07899.vapier@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: udev and /usr by Nirbheek Chauhan
1 On Sunday, September 25, 2011 21:57:27 Nirbheek Chauhan wrote:
2 > But neither portage, nor the portage tree, nor any of our branding are
3 > shipped with ChromeOS. Hence it's as much a Gentoo install as $company
4 > that uses portage to build $image for their embedded device, but
5 > doesn't leave any trace of Gentoo behind.
6
7 you don't need a portage tree. binpkgs work just fine. all the metadata is
8 pulled down as you go.
9
10 i'm not saying it is Gentoo, but it is clearly a derivative that relies on
11 quite a bit of the tree to build.
12 -mike

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature