| 1 |
On Mon, 12 Oct 2015 15:47:19 +0200 |
| 2 |
hasufell <hasufell@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> On 10/12/2015 03:29 PM, Ian Delaney wrote: |
| 5 |
> > |
| 6 |
> > Not sure how to read this. The whole idea is for provider / client |
| 7 |
> > to communicate and negotiate a workable solution. At a glance this |
| 8 |
> > reads as the user needs to adapt to the service that the client is |
| 9 |
> > offering and appease the provider. What's wrong with this picture? |
| 10 |
> > |
| 11 |
> > How exactly may I ask does anyone actually offer help to the |
| 12 |
> > Reviewers project whose whole aim it seems is to help all us who |
| 13 |
> > cannot write ebuilds right? |
| 14 |
> > |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
> Nowhere did way say that people cannot write ebuilds, nor did we |
| 17 |
> impose that picture. That all happened in your own mind. |
| 18 |
> |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
Yes Julian. Neither did I Julian. I said 'who cannot write ebuilds |
| 21 |
RIGHT'. Please stop taking words out of my mouth and distorting my |
| 22 |
message. |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
> Your picture about our goals is completely incorrect and you seem to |
| 25 |
> respond to something that's not really our project. So I'd like to ask |
| 26 |
> you to take a few moments and actually read our replies and the |
| 27 |
> project page, before we derail even further here. |
| 28 |
> |
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
Yes Julian. You have it right and I have it wrong. I feel relieved now |
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
-- |
| 33 |
kind regards |
| 34 |
|
| 35 |
Ian Delaney |
Archives