| 1 |
On Thursday, April 7, 2016 6:22:16 PM CEST, Rich Freeman wrote: |
| 2 |
> Again, I don't see this as a reason not to make it optional, but I |
| 3 |
> suspect that we will find bugs here from time to time which users who |
| 4 |
> run with the split /usr will have to report/fix. |
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
Considering the advantages of usr-merge are rather specific IMHO but risks |
| 8 |
during the migration are high, I think you're optimistic on the user base |
| 9 |
of usr-merged systems :) |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
Heck, it hasn't happened yet because there hasn't been such a big need for |
| 12 |
it. |
Archives