Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Homer Parker <hparker@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] About what would be included in EAPI5
Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2012 12:07:15
Message-Id: 1340280281.5028.4.camel@homer
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] About what would be included in EAPI5 by Ciaran McCreesh
On Wed, 2012-06-20 at 17:50 +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> > > Then there are ebuilds that don't call eautoreconf, in the first > > place. Should we require that all of them inherit autotools now, > just > > for the unlikely case that user patches could be applied? > > If the aim is to provide a working feature to users, yes. The > alternative is to not provide user patches support.
Damnit, let the user shoot themself in the foot but let them learn from it. Remember back in the day when you had no clue? You learned from it. You can only protect them so much. If they want to use custom patches then they need to learn how. -- Homer Parker <hparker@g.o>

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] About what would be included in EAPI5 Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccreesh@××××××××××.com>