1 |
On 01/03/11 08:32, Nirbheek Chauhan wrote: |
2 |
> On Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at 4:04 AM, Nirbheek Chauhan <nirbheek@g.o> wrote: |
3 |
>> On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 8:28 AM, Donnie Berkholz <dberkholz@g.o> wrote: |
4 |
>>> On 11:13 Sun 27 Feb , Gilles Dartiguelongue wrote: |
5 |
>>>> a quick mail to announce that the gnome team, in order to prepare for |
6 |
>>>> gnome 3, started slotting a lot of gnome team managed packages. If you |
7 |
>>>> find yourself using such a package, please update your ebuilds to use |
8 |
>>>> slot notations or other EAPI compliant notation resulting in the same |
9 |
>>>> effect. |
10 |
>>> |
11 |
>>> This email would be much more useful if it included a list of affected |
12 |
>>> packages, sorted by maintainer and/or herd. |
13 |
>>> |
14 |
>> |
15 |
>> As requested, here is a (probably) complete list of packages which |
16 |
>> depend on x11-libs/gtk+ without a slot. The list was generated using |
17 |
>> the tinderbox rindex, so it may be slightly out of date. |
18 |
>> |
19 |
> |
20 |
> I just realized that there was a bug in my script which caused the |
21 |
> maintainer-sorted list to not group packages together. Attached is an |
22 |
> updated list. |
23 |
> |
24 |
|
25 |
Things for |
26 |
|
27 |
|
28 |
Herd: sci |
29 |
Herd: sci-chemistry |
30 |
Maintainer: markusle@g.o |
31 |
Maintainer: cryos@g.o |
32 |
Maintainer: jlec@g.o |
33 |
|
34 |
|
35 |
are fixed. |