Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: justin <jlec@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] gtk 3 preparation work
Date: Wed, 02 Mar 2011 14:02:46
Message-Id: 4D6E4DD7.10108@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] gtk 3 preparation work by Nirbheek Chauhan
On 01/03/11 08:32, Nirbheek Chauhan wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at 4:04 AM, Nirbheek Chauhan <nirbheek@g.o> wrote: >> On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 8:28 AM, Donnie Berkholz <dberkholz@g.o> wrote: >>> On 11:13 Sun 27 Feb , Gilles Dartiguelongue wrote: >>>> a quick mail to announce that the gnome team, in order to prepare for >>>> gnome 3, started slotting a lot of gnome team managed packages. If you >>>> find yourself using such a package, please update your ebuilds to use >>>> slot notations or other EAPI compliant notation resulting in the same >>>> effect. >>> >>> This email would be much more useful if it included a list of affected >>> packages, sorted by maintainer and/or herd. >>> >> >> As requested, here is a (probably) complete list of packages which >> depend on x11-libs/gtk+ without a slot. The list was generated using >> the tinderbox rindex, so it may be slightly out of date. >> > > I just realized that there was a bug in my script which caused the > maintainer-sorted list to not group packages together. Attached is an > updated list. >
Things for Herd: sci Herd: sci-chemistry Maintainer: markusle@g.o Maintainer: cryos@g.o Maintainer: jlec@g.o are fixed.

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] gtk 3 preparation work Kevin McCarthy <signals@g.o>