| 1 |
On Sun, Sep 18, 2011 at 7:57 PM, Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto |
| 2 |
<jmbsvicetto@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
> On 18-09-2011 12:59, Nirbheek Chauhan wrote: |
| 4 |
>> I'm astonished by the large amount of misinformation that is being |
| 5 |
>> spread around about systemd. If this originated on the gentoo-user |
| 6 |
>> mailing list, I'm disappointed that Gentoo users wouldn't do some |
| 7 |
>> basic research. |
| 8 |
>> |
| 9 |
>> I kind of expect this kind of trigger-happy FUD from websites like |
| 10 |
>> omgubuntu, but surely Gentoo folk are more mature. |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> You mean that no Linux users, in particular anyone not running or not |
| 13 |
> wanting to run GNOME and Fedora, shouldn't be worried about the way |
| 14 |
> some people in the GNOME and Fedora community seem intent to impose |
| 15 |
> their ways to everyone else? |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
If their ways are better, there should be absolutely no problem. |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
> Worse, in the process seeming to want to |
| 20 |
> convince everyone they found the panacea and that the "old unix ways" |
| 21 |
> that have been around for 40+ years are all obsolete and that we |
| 22 |
> should give in to "the collective"? |
| 23 |
> |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
I don't see how this is relevant to the problem of udev and /usr at |
| 26 |
all. Unless you want to go back to the days of devfs and lots of |
| 27 |
manual configuration. :) |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
My problem was with people blaming the need for an initramfs on |
| 30 |
systemd, which is not true at all. The discussion of the relative |
| 31 |
merits and demerits of systemd is an entirely different discussion. |
| 32 |
|
| 33 |
-- |
| 34 |
~Nirbheek Chauhan |
| 35 |
|
| 36 |
Gentoo GNOME+Mozilla Team |
Archives