1 |
El vie, 21-11-2014 a las 10:10 -0500, Tim Harder escribió: |
2 |
> On 2014-11-21 09:54, hasufell wrote: |
3 |
> > There are users who seem to like it and the games team wants to keep it |
4 |
> > as well, so I don't see a reason to push into that direction. |
5 |
> |
6 |
> > The main thing is that you cannot turn off all the permission stuff in |
7 |
> > the eclass whether you like it or not. Changing the install variables |
8 |
> > thing is just for convenience and already possible. |
9 |
> |
10 |
> If people don't want to use the games eclass, then don't use it. I |
11 |
> thought this had already been discussed and mostly ok-ed. |
12 |
> |
13 |
> I don't see the point of adding circumvention methods if you can just |
14 |
> avoid it altogether. |
15 |
> |
16 |
> Tim |
17 |
|
18 |
Personally I lost the track in all the games.eclass issue... I thought |
19 |
it was going to be dropped finally :/ |
20 |
|
21 |
The problem I see in keeping it and also allow people to not use that |
22 |
one is that we will have some games installed in different places and |
23 |
permissions than others... and that looks really inconsistent to me (I |
24 |
guess people will simply keep adding themselves to games group... but, |
25 |
in that case, what is the purpose of keeping that group and special |
26 |
paths?) |