Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: "Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn" <chithanh@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in net-im/qutecom: metadata.xml ChangeLog qutecom-2.2_p20110210.ebuild
Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2011 14:58:38
Message-Id: 4E96FC7A.10208@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in net-im/qutecom: metadata.xml ChangeLog qutecom-2.2_p20110210.ebuild by Ciaran McCreesh
1 Ciaran McCreesh schrieb:
2 > On Thu, 13 Oct 2011 12:23:07 +0200
3 > Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn <chithanh@g.o> wrote:
4 >> So qutecom is not broken and needs not be removed as long as
5 >> <linux-headers-2.6.38 is in the tree.
6 > Dependencies using <, <=, =, ~ or =* are broken, except in certain
7 > special situations inside ||.
8
9 I don't find that documented anywhere. Besides, a number of packages use
10 = and ~ not inside ||. Are they all broken? How do you suggest to
11 address this?
12
13
14 Best regards,
15 Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn