1 |
On 12/03/2016 10:41 AM, Michał Górny wrote: |
2 |
> On Sat, 3 Dec 2016 10:35:32 +0100 |
3 |
> Patrice Clement <monsieurp@g.o> wrote: |
4 |
> |
5 |
>> Friday 02 Dec 2016 14:10:27, Michał Górny wrote : |
6 |
>>> Hi, everyone. |
7 |
>>> |
8 |
>>> I've heard multiple times about various tinderbox projects being |
9 |
>>> started by individuals in Gentoo. In fact, so many different projects |
10 |
>>> that I've forgotten who was working on most of them. |
11 |
>>> |
12 |
>>> I know that Toralf is doing tinderboxing for most of the stuff. |
13 |
>>> What other projects do we have there? What is their status? |
14 |
>>> |
15 |
>>> Is there anything we could try to integrate with pull requests to get |
16 |
>>> a better testing? |
17 |
>>> |
18 |
>>> -- |
19 |
>>> Best regards, |
20 |
>>> Michał Górny |
21 |
>>> <http://dev.gentoo.org/~mgorny/> |
22 |
>> |
23 |
>> Continuous integration is all the rage these days and tinderboxing is the |
24 |
>> obvious way to go concerning Gentoo. AFAIK, Toralf is the only contributor |
25 |
>> doing tinderboxing out of his own will. In reality, we should have a team of |
26 |
>> devs looking after our own tinderboxes instead of relying on the community. |
27 |
>> |
28 |
>> I'm wondering if we could start a donation campain for this project and ask |
29 |
>> people if they've got spare machines laying around. I know a lot of folks are |
30 |
>> reading this mailing list so maybe asking on gentoo-dev first for a start would |
31 |
>> be appropriate. |
32 |
> |
33 |
> Hardware is not the problem. Lack of software is. |
34 |
> |
35 |
|
36 |
Have you considered using openQA[1] like openSUSE[2] and Fedora[3] do |
37 |
instead of reinventing the wheel? |
38 |
|
39 |
[1] http://open.qa/ |
40 |
[2] https://openqa.opensuse.org/ |
41 |
[3] https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/ |
42 |
|
43 |
-- |
44 |
Regards, |
45 |
Markos Chandras |