1 |
On Fri, 8 Jul 2016 10:01:58 -0500 William Hubbs wrote: |
2 |
> On Fri, Jul 08, 2016 at 08:10:07AM -0500, james wrote: |
3 |
> > On 07/08/2016 05:17 AM, Andrew Savchenko wrote: |
4 |
> > > On Thu, 7 Jul 2016 20:30:36 -0400 Anthony G. Basile wrote: |
5 |
> > >> Hi everyone, |
6 |
> > >> |
7 |
> > >> I emailed the list some time ago about giving away a bunch of bitcoin |
8 |
> > >> forks to see if anyone was interested in taking them. I didn't get any |
9 |
> > >> feedback so as of tomorrow I'll be masking the following for removal in |
10 |
> > >> 30 days. |
11 |
> > > |
12 |
> > > Any reason for mask and removal? Are these packages broken? |
13 |
> > > Just drop them to maintainer-needed. |
14 |
> > > |
15 |
> > > Best regards, |
16 |
> > > Andrew Savchenko |
17 |
> > > |
18 |
> > |
19 |
> > Perhaps we should start posting these orphaned-package announcements to |
20 |
> > gentoo-user, so folks interested in learning about ebuilds can ponder |
21 |
> > proxy-maintenance of a few packages as an opportunity? |
22 |
> |
23 |
> I'm not sure that's necessary, that's what g-d-a is for. |
24 |
|
25 |
How many users are subscribed to the gentoo-dev-announce ML? The |
26 |
very name suggests that this is development announce, not something |
27 |
related to our users. |
28 |
|
29 |
We already duplicate Last-rites messages to gentoo-dev ML, why not |
30 |
add gentoo-user here too? Why do we need to duplicate Last-rites on |
31 |
gentoo-dev in the first place? I suppose there are two reasons: |
32 |
|
33 |
1) even not all devs are subscribed to gentoo-dev-announce; |
34 |
2) this is a moderated list, which creates some delays. |
35 |
|
36 |
Best regards, |
37 |
Andrew Savchenko |