| 1 |
On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 07:55:38AM +0000, Tony "Chainsaw" Vroon wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Wed, 2012-12-26 at 22:01 -0600, William Hubbs wrote: |
| 3 |
> > Actually, since ulm pointed out in another thread that the |
| 4 |
> > council has not mandated that we support separate /usr without an |
| 5 |
> > initramfs, I am re-considering this. |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> So now that the /usr-merge steamroller can not break systems through |
| 8 |
> udev, because an alternative now exists... another way must be found? |
| 9 |
> That seems rather immature. |
| 10 |
> What must be forked next to keep this working? openrc? |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
Nothing must be forked. No one has said anything is happening yet. This |
| 13 |
is just a discussion. |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
William |
Archives