1 |
On Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 1:55 PM, Michał Górny <mgorny@g.o> wrote: |
2 |
>> |
3 |
>> The pain is for a short time. Then we have to live with this for a |
4 |
>> long time. USE flags should have one meaning. The fact that this |
5 |
>> isn't the case right now is already a bug. We don't need to |
6 |
>> perpetuate it. |
7 |
> |
8 |
> No, the pain is neverending. You define a number of flags which are |
9 |
> scattered all over the place and there's practically no good value but |
10 |
> the 'default'. |
11 |
> |
12 |
|
13 |
My response was intended as a comparison of the two options presented, |
14 |
which so far are the only options that have been suggested by anybody |
15 |
that don't require EAPI changes. |
16 |
|
17 |
I wasn't suggesting that there wasn't room for improvement in general. |
18 |
However, short of banning libressl until EAPI7 and actually doing |
19 |
something in EAPI7 this is our current best option. |
20 |
|
21 |
-- |
22 |
Rich |