| 1 |
To revisit this topic... |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
>>>> so we're pushing for 2.0.51 to get out of rc and into final ? |
| 4 |
|
| 5 |
>>> I'm looking at it for the end of this week. Only one tiny bug |
| 6 |
>>> left of which we are aware. (rsync being dumb) |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
>> I know I'm being picky and what not, but could it be possible |
| 9 |
>> to have an email sent to -dev detailing the major changes |
| 10 |
>> between .50 and .51? |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
The details came out a while ago... They are in the lists and |
| 13 |
the changelog if you're interested. |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
Definately need a few testers though. I'm expecting this to be |
| 16 |
the last _rc. I mean it this time. |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
We're aiming at super-expedited. It's clean, it behaves... |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
Test it. |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
Anyone with a proxy: A patch that might allow portage to use a |
| 23 |
proxy with binary packages. Assuming my assumption is right it |
| 24 |
should work with amazing simplicity. Anyone that wishes to fix |
| 25 |
it if it doesn't work, please feel free. |
| 26 |
http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=61845 |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
--NJ |
Archives