1 |
Hi. |
2 |
|
3 |
Petteri Räty wrote: |
4 |
> <p> |
5 |
> Before you can mentor anyone, you must have been with Gentoo for at |
6 |
> least six |
7 |
> -months or must be a project lead. |
8 |
> +months. Previously being a project lead was enough too but with GLEP 39 |
9 |
> anyone |
10 |
> +can create new projects. |
11 |
> </p> |
12 |
> |
13 |
> </body> |
14 |
> |
15 |
> |
16 |
> Regards, |
17 |
> Petteri |
18 |
> -- |
19 |
> Gentoo/Recruiters lead |
20 |
> Gentoo/Java lead |
21 |
> |
22 |
|
23 |
Petteri, I assumed this was already the case and it makes perfect sense |
24 |
to me. |
25 |
There's one thing that you're not addressing though. We have different |
26 |
types of developers amongst us, so how do we count the 6 months period? |
27 |
Let me explain more fully. At this point, I could mentor someone into |
28 |
becoming a new moderator in the forums, but I don't think anyone would |
29 |
support me being an ebuild dev mentor - not being one myself yet. IIRC, |
30 |
documentation devs don't need to be ebuild devs. Does anyone propose |
31 |
that I could be a docs dev mentor - not being part of the team? Finally, |
32 |
should a 6+ month ebuild dev, recently becoming part of the docs or |
33 |
forums moderation team, be allowed to be a mentor for those teams? |
34 |
Perhaps we should require that the dev be part of Gentoo for at least |
35 |
six months and in the case of mentoring for the forums or the docs team, |
36 |
that he/she has the blessing of the team lead(s) - in case the dev isn't |
37 |
part of the respective team for at least X months. Do we want X to be 6 |
38 |
months? |
39 |
Anyone agrees/disagrees? |
40 |
|
41 |
|
42 |
-- |
43 |
Jorge Vicetto (jmbsvicetto) - jmbsvicetto at gentoo dot org |
44 |
Gentoo-forums / Userrel |
45 |
-- |
46 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |