| 1 |
Alec Warner napsal(a): |
| 2 |
> Jakub Moc wrote: |
| 3 |
>> Danny van Dyk napsal(a): |
| 4 |
>>> which breaks the metadata cache. Any objections to change it |
| 5 |
>>> to |
| 6 |
>>> |
| 7 |
>>> SLOT=0 |
| 8 |
>> As noted on the relevant bug [1], the eclass is a complete no-op and |
| 9 |
>> nothing can be installed using this eclass (has been so for quite some |
| 10 |
>> time). Fixing it doesn't make sense, making it dummy or even removing it |
| 11 |
>> (plus the unusable single ebuild which inherits it) does. |
| 12 |
>> |
| 13 |
>> |
| 14 |
>> [1] http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=162960 |
| 15 |
>> |
| 16 |
> |
| 17 |
> And we already told you, removing it isn't a good solution (even if it |
| 18 |
> technically works within the bounds of the current api). The bug is |
| 19 |
> that the SLOT invalidates cache entries and it's trivial to fix. |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
The eclass is not trivial to fix, to be fixed, this eclass would require |
| 22 |
a complete rewrite from scratch. There's no usable ebuild for this |
| 23 |
eclass and the eclass is completely moot. Still fail to see what are you |
| 24 |
trying to fix as opposed to removing a broken non-functional cruft from |
| 25 |
the tree. |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
-- |
| 29 |
Best regards, |
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
Jakub Moc |
| 32 |
mailto:jakub@g.o |
| 33 |
GPG signature: |
| 34 |
http://subkeys.pgp.net:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xCEBA3D9E |
| 35 |
Primary key fingerprint: D2D7 933C 9BA1 C95B 2C95 B30F 8717 D5FD CEBA 3D9E |
| 36 |
|
| 37 |
... still no signature ;) |
Archives