From: | Rich Freeman <rich0@g.o> | ||
---|---|---|---|
To: | gentoo-dev <gentoo-dev@l.g.o> | ||
Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] newsitem: initramfs required on Linux systems with separate /usr | ||
Date: | Wed, 25 Sep 2013 14:52:04 | ||
Message-Id: | CAGfcS_=djiL2=Ad-MxxCUV+y5rPS1Ak-r_QEmrK-55wqD3CY8A@mail.gmail.com | ||
In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] newsitem: initramfs required on Linux systems with separate /usr by Ian Stakenvicius |
1 | On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 10:09 AM, Ian Stakenvicius <axs@g.o> wrote: |
2 | > William, I think what Tom was mentioning here is that he thinks a |
3 | > one-sentence answering the "Why" would be a good idea to have in the |
4 | > news item, so users that don't have a clue on all of these sep-/usr |
5 | > issues will get an idea of why the change is being made. |
6 | |
7 | How about something like: |
8 | Due to many upstream changes properly supporting a separate /usr |
9 | without an initramfs has become increasingly difficult - despite all |
10 | our efforts it already breaks in some exotic configurations, and this |
11 | is a trend likely to grow worse. |
12 | |
13 | Rich |
Subject | Author |
---|---|
Re: [gentoo-dev] newsitem: initramfs required on Linux systems with separate /usr | Ian Stakenvicius <axs@g.o> |
Re: [gentoo-dev] newsitem: initramfs required on Linux systems with separate /usr | Alan McKinnon <alan.mckinnon@×××××.com> |