Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Peter Stuge <peter@×××××.se>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] libusb-compat preference in virtual/libusb:0 not strong enough?
Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2013 15:17:48
Message-Id: 20130211151728.2557.qmail@stuge.se
In Reply to: [gentoo-dev] libusb-compat preference in virtual/libusb:0 not strong enough? by Maxim Kammerer
1 Maxim Kammerer wrote:
2 > * These packages depend on libusb:
3
4 One stands out:
5
6 > app-crypt/ccid-1.4.8 (usb ? virtual/libusb:1)
7 > app-crypt/gnupg-2.0.19 (usb ? virtual/libusb:0)
8 > dev-libs/openobex-1.5 (usb ? virtual/libusb:0)
9 > media-libs/libmtp-1.1.5 (virtual/libusb:1)
10 > net-libs/libpcap-1.3.0-r1 (canusb ? virtual/libusb)
11
12 This one has no slotted dependency. Does that matter? In any case it
13 doesn't seem completely correct, since the two APIs are not
14 compatible.
15
16
17 > Any idea on what's going on? BFS instead of DFS search when
18 > satisfying "||"?
19
20 Seems a good explanation.. Can you try swapping the two in the virtual?
21
22
23 //Peter

Replies