Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Joshua Kinard <kumba@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Deprecation and removal of 13.0 profiles is imminent
Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2019 03:05:21
Message-Id: 8d3a06b6-d86e-a031-a55c-4c397d6d2b88@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Deprecation and removal of 13.0 profiles is imminent by Sergei Trofimovich
1 On 2/19/2019 17:52, Sergei Trofimovich wrote:
2
3 >>> Tl;DR: 13.0 profiles will be removed some time soon unless there are
4 >>> enough reports broken on 13.0->17.0 switch.
5 >>>
6 >>> 13.0 profiles been a while in Gentoo tree and are already deprecated
7 >>> on some arches but not everywhere.
8 >>>
9
10 [snip]
11
12 >
13 > hardened/linux/mips/mipsel/multilib/n32
14 > hardened/linux/mips/mipsel/multilib/n64
15 > hardened/linux/mips/mipsel/n32
16 > hardened/linux/mips/mipsel/n64
17 > hardened/linux/mips/multilib/n32
18 > hardened/linux/mips/multilib/n64
19 > hardened/linux/mips/n32
20 > hardened/linux/mips/n64
21 >
22
23 [snip]
24
25 >
26 > +hardened@ (and +arm@, +mips@, +ppc@, +ppc64) ,
27 > is it fine to redirect these to vanilla 17.0 profiles?
28
29 Speaking for mips, I can't think of any issues for the hardened/13.0
30 profiles. The default 13.0 profiles should be left alone a bit longer,
31 though. Transition shouldn't be a problem with those, as I last did a
32 catalyst run from Sept 18 to Nov 18 that had no issues, but end of year
33 obligations sidetracked me, so I need to eventually start over again with a
34 more recent catalyst run to make 17.0 stages available.
35
36 --
37 Joshua Kinard
38 Gentoo/MIPS
39 kumba@g.o
40 rsa6144/5C63F4E3F5C6C943 2015-04-27
41 177C 1972 1FB8 F254 BAD0 3E72 5C63 F4E3 F5C6 C943
42
43 "The past tempts us, the present confuses us, the future frightens us. And
44 our lives slip away, moment by moment, lost in that vast, terrible in-between."
45
46 --Emperor Turhan, Centauri Republic