Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: William Hubbs <williamh@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver
Date: Thu, 31 May 2012 20:58:11
Message-Id: 20120531205714.GA25021@linux1
In Reply to: [gentoo-dev] Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver by Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@cox.net>
On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 08:26:58PM +0000, Duncan wrote:
> William Hubbs posted on Thu, 31 May 2012 14:54:50 -0500 as excerpted: > > I don't know what's going to happen to all the overlays with the main > tree switch to git, but won't that break various "overlay first" > policies, say for the kde overlay? > > Of course, if all the official overlays are converted to git branches of > the main tree... but won't they still require rebasing as they've already > been pushed? (This assumes your workaround idea doesn't work. If it > does, great!)
Overlays aren't really part of this discussion; those are independent trees which we have no control over, so commiting changes from overlays to the main tree is the responsibility of the overlay maintainers. William

Replies

Subject Author
[gentoo-dev] Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@×××.net>