1 |
On Saturday 30 September 2006 18:59, Alin Nastac wrote: |
2 |
> I discovered that ppp-2.4.4 set a default route without a gateway. It is |
3 |
> totally fine from IP routing point of view (the simple fact that route |
4 |
> is through the point-to-point link is enough to know the next hop), |
5 |
> except that openswan's %defaultroute need a default gateway in order to |
6 |
> work. |
7 |
|
8 |
So how does that look in the routing table? |
9 |
|
10 |
If say a DHCP client renewed it's lease and it set a new default route, would |
11 |
this have any effect? |
12 |
|
13 |
> I'm about to apply a patch that would reverse to the old way of setting |
14 |
> the default route. |
15 |
> Any objections? |
16 |
|
17 |
If it's p.masked then none :) |
18 |
|
19 |
Thanks |
20 |
|
21 |
-- |
22 |
Roy Marples <uberlord@g.o> |
23 |
Gentoo/Linux Developer (baselayout, networking) |
24 |
-- |
25 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |