1 |
On 20.06.2012 22:35, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
2 |
> On Wed, 20 Jun 2012 16:25:30 -0400 |
3 |
> Richard Yao <ryao@g.o> wrote: |
4 |
>> Multilib (and/or multiarch) support |
5 |
>> The current binaries cause a great deal of pain, particularly |
6 |
>> when a user does not want to upgrade something. I had this problem |
7 |
>> with WINE and glibc because I wanted to avoid the reverse memcpy() |
8 |
>> fiasco on my systems. This situation would have been avoided entirely |
9 |
>> if the package manager supported multilib. |
10 |
> |
11 |
> This one's unlikely to happen unless someone's prepared to put in the |
12 |
> work. |
13 |
|
14 |
Tommy worked a lot on this and he asked for help to bring his |
15 |
proposal/spec/glep into shape. |
16 |
We are all aware what this is all about and know that anybody who is |
17 |
using multilib would benefit. |
18 |
Can't you simply work with him together to get it into what you expect |
19 |
it to be instead of pointing out that it isn't? |