1 |
On Wed, Apr 07, 2004 at 09:39:04AM -0700, David Sparks wrote: |
2 |
> Going by these bugs: |
3 |
> |
4 |
> http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40831 |
5 |
> |
6 |
> http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=47112 |
7 |
> |
8 |
> it seems that some ebuilds don't do the usual month long cycle at ~arch |
9 |
> before being promoted to arch status. |
10 |
|
11 |
The first bug refers to a Portage problem that seems to have nothing at |
12 |
all to do with ~arch; can you explain why you referenced it? |
13 |
|
14 |
I can't speak for the second, except that developers sometimes make last |
15 |
minute changes and forget to test them. |
16 |
|
17 |
> Is there a list of the apps that don't have to have their ebuilds QA'd |
18 |
> before being marked stable? |
19 |
> |
20 |
|
21 |
One month is an approximate guideline. It's up to the maintainer. If you |
22 |
feel a specific maintainer is consistently screwing up, please contact |
23 |
devrel@g.o. |
24 |
|
25 |
-- |
26 |
Jon Portnoy |
27 |
avenj/irc.freenode.net |
28 |
|
29 |
-- |
30 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |